Astronomy tools · Untracked exposure

NPF rule: longest untracked exposure.

Enter aperture, pixel pitch and focal length. Get the NPF exposure time, how long the star trail is in pixels at that time, and how the 500 rule compares.

The 500 rule is easy to remember and has stopped working on modern sensors, which is why the NPF rule exists. Light Stalking’s write-up credits it to Frédéric Michaud for the Société Astronomique du Havre and sets it out as (35 × aperture + 30 × pixel pitch) ÷ focal length, in seconds. This page runs that and then does something the formula does not: it turns the answer into a trail length in pixels, so you can see how much trailing each rule is actually allowing.

Short answer: For a 24 mm f/2.8 lens on a 35.9 mm sensor with 6016 pixels across, pixel pitch is 5.97 µm and the NPF time is 11.5 seconds. The 500 rule says 20.8 seconds. At 11.5 seconds the stars trail about 3.4 pixels; at 20.8 seconds about 6.1.

Sources listed belowChecked 26 October 2026

What the NPF rule says

The rule gives the longest exposure before a star’s motion is noticeable, from three things: the lens aperture N (as an f-number), the sensor’s pixel pitch p in micrometres, and the focal length f in millimetres. Light Stalking states it as exposure in seconds ≈ (35 × N + 30 × p) ÷ f. Pixel pitch is the sensor width in millimetres divided by the pixels across it, times 1000. Unlike the 500 rule it knows how fine the pixels are, so a high-resolution sensor gets a shorter time than a low-resolution one behind the same lens.

Use the real focal length

Pixel pitch already carries the sensor’s size, so enter the focal length printed on the lens. Entering a 35 mm equivalent would count the crop factor twice. The one place a crop factor matters is the 500 rule, which was written for full frame; the optional field divides 500 by the equivalent focal length for that comparison only.

What the trail length shows

The sky turns once in a sidereal day, which Wikipedia gives as about 86,164.09 seconds, so a star on the celestial equator moves 1,296,000 ÷ 86,164.09 = 15.04 arcseconds per second. Wikipedia’s plate scale page gives the image scale as 206,265 × pixel size ÷ focal length, in arcseconds per pixel. Divide one by the other and you have the trail in pixels for any exposure. That arithmetic is this page’s, not part of the published rule. It shows that NPF is not a zero-trail guarantee: at its own time it allows a few pixels of smear.

Declination

Stars near the celestial pole move across the frame more slowly than stars on the equator, by the cosine of the declination. If you enter a declination, the page divides the NPF time by that cosine and reports the trail at the longer time. The Light Stalking article itself is unclear on the direction of its declination setting and advises leaving it at zero if you are unsure, so treat the stretched time as geometry, not as part of the published formula. Use the declination of the stars farthest from the pole in your frame.

Worked example

Light Stalking works a Nikon D750 with a 24 mm f/2.8 lens: sensor 35.9 × 24.0 mm, 6016 × 4016 pixels, so pixel pitch is 35.9 ÷ 6016 × 1000 = 5.97 µm. NPF = (35 × 2.8 + 30 × 5.97) ÷ 24 = (98 + 179.1) ÷ 24 = 11.5 seconds, which the article rounds to 12. The 500 rule gives 500 ÷ 24 = 20.8 seconds, which the article says can show trails in large prints. The image scale is 206,265 × 0.00597 ÷ 24 = 51.3 arcseconds per pixel, so 11.5 seconds gives a trail of 15.04 × 11.54 = 173.6 arcseconds, or 3.4 pixels, and 20.8 seconds gives 6.1 pixels.

Limits

The NPF rule is a rule of thumb for untracked, fixed-tripod shots. It says nothing about lens sharpness, wind, or how big you print. If you are tracking, the limit is set by your polar alignment instead, and the polar alignment calculator linked here handles that case.

Frequently asked questions

What is the NPF rule formula?

Exposure in seconds ≈ (35 × aperture + 30 × pixel pitch in µm) ÷ focal length in mm. Light Stalking credits it to Frédéric Michaud of the Société Astronomique du Havre.

How do I find my pixel pitch?

Divide the sensor width in millimetres by the number of pixels across it and multiply by 1000. A 35.9 mm sensor with 6016 pixels gives 5.97 µm. Many camera spec sheets list it too.

Is NPF better than the 500 rule?

It uses the pixel size and aperture, which the 500 rule ignores, so on high-resolution sensors it gives shorter and safer times. In the worked example the 500 rule allows nearly twice the NPF time.

Should I use the equivalent focal length on a crop sensor?

No. Use the lens’s real focal length with the real pixel pitch; pixel pitch already reflects the crop. Only the 500 rule needs the equivalent focal length.

Does declination change the answer?

Stars away from the equator trail less, by the cosine of the declination. The tool offers a stretched time for the declination you enter, and it is geometry, not part of the published NPF formula.

Can I use this with a tracker or equatorial mount?

No. NPF is for a fixed camera. With tracking the limit is your polar alignment, covered by the polar alignment star trail calculator.

Sources and how it is calculated

Retrieved

The NPF time is the Light Stalking formula. Trail length, the declination stretch and the 500 rule comparison are this page’s own arithmetic from the sidereal rate and the plate scale. Pages were read on 26 October 2026.

Runs entirely in your browser. Nothing you type is sent or stored. Not affiliated with any forum, software maker or publisher named on this page.

A starting point for a test shot

Take a test frame, zoom to 100%, and check the stars. Lens quality, wind and print size all change how much trailing you can accept.

Advertisement
Advertisement